PRINCIPLE STATEMENT

For Order 28 rule 6 to apply, there must be an admission in the pleadings or otherwise by a party, and the trial judge has discretion, even where admission exists or is proved, to give judgment or grant an order as may appear just to the trial judge.

RATIO DECIDENDI (SOURCE)

Per Uwais, J.S.C., in National Bank of Nigeria Limited v. Guthrie (Nig.) Limited & Anor (1993) NLC-1071987(SC) at pp. 10–11; Paras A–B.
"It is clear from these provisions that for Order 28 rule 6 to apply there must be an admission in the pleadings or otherwise by a party or parties to a case and that the trial Judge has a discretion, even where the admission exists or is proved, to give judgment or grant an order as may appear just to the trial Judge."
View Judgment

EXPLANATION / SCOPE

Order 28 rule 6 has two requirements: (1) admission by a party in pleadings or otherwise—acknowledgment can be in formal pleadings, correspondence, affidavits, or other communications; (2) judicial discretion—even with clear admission, the judge may refuse summary judgment if justice requires full trial. Admission is necessary but insufficient—courts retain discretion to consider whether summary disposal serves justice. Factors affecting discretion include: whether defenses beyond the admitted facts exist, whether cross-claims complicate matters, or whether full trial would better serve justice. “As may appear just” gives judges flexibility to refuse summary judgment despite admissions when circumstances warrant full hearing. This balances efficiency against ensuring fair adjudication.

CASES APPLYING THIS PRINCIPLE