PRINCIPLE STATEMENT

The existence of a legal or equitable mortgage is a question of fact which must be proved by production of the properly executed mortgage deed or other admissible evidence; mere oral assertion or hearsay evidence is insufficient to establish a valid and subsisting mortgage with priority over a purchaser's interest.

RATIO DECIDENDI (SOURCE)

Per Wali, JSC, in Anaeze v. Anyaso (1993) NLC-261991(SC) at pp. 18–20; Paras A–D.
"The existence of a legal or equitable mortgage is a question of fact which must be proved by the production of the properly executed mortgage deed or other admissible evidence. Mere oral assertion or hearsay evidence is insufficient to establish a valid and subsisting mortgage with priority over a purchaser's interest."
View Judgment

EXPLANATION / SCOPE

Mortgages create significant property interests requiring proper proof. Legal mortgages require written deeds; equitable mortgages may arise from writing or conduct showing intent to create security. Proof requires producing the mortgage deed (best evidence) or other admissible evidence: written agreements, deposit of title documents, or conduct evidencing mortgage creation. Oral testimony alone cannot establish mortgages—they’re property interests requiring documentary evidence under the Statute of Frauds principles. Hearsay (testimony about what others said about the mortgage) is inadmissible. This strict proof requirement protects purchasers from false claims of prior mortgages and ensures security interests are properly documented. Without proper proof, alleged mortgages cannot prevail against bona fide purchasers who acquire interests without notice of the mortgage.

CASES APPLYING THIS PRINCIPLE