PRINCIPLE STATEMENT

Parties are bound by their pleadings and evidence which is at variance with the averments in the pleadings goes to no issue and should be discountenanced by the court.

RATIO DECIDENDI (SOURCE)

Per Iguh, JSC, in Akinfolarin v. Akinnola (1994) NLC-4441989(SC) at p. 22; Para B.
"Parties are bound by their pleadings and evidence which is at variance with the averments in the pleadings goes to no issue and should be discountenanced by the court."
View Judgment

EXPLANATION / SCOPE

This fundamental pleading principle requires: parties prove what they’ve pleaded, not something different; evidence must correspond to pleaded facts; courts ignore evidence departing from pleadings. “Bound by pleadings” means parties cannot: shift theories at trial, prove unpleaded facts, or rely on claims/defenses not raised in pleadings. Evidence “at variance with” pleadings includes: testimony contradicting pleaded facts, proving different causes of action, or establishing defenses not pleaded. Such evidence “goes to no issue”—no issue was raised by pleadings for this evidence to address, rendering it irrelevant and inadmissible. This rule serves: fair notice (opponents prepare based on pleadings), issue definition (pleadings frame disputes), and preventing surprise. However, amendments can cure variances if timely. The principle enforces pleading discipline and ensures trials proceed on clearly defined issues with adequate notice to all parties.

CASES APPLYING THIS PRINCIPLE