PRINCIPLE STATEMENT

The test to be applied for the joinder of an intervener is whether they will be directly affected by the judgment of the court in the suit by curtailing or interfering with the enjoyment of their legal right—because the only reason which makes it necessary to make a person a party to an action is that they should be bound by the result of the action and the question to be settled therefore must be a question in the action which cannot be effectually and completely settled unless they are a party.

RATIO DECIDENDI (SOURCE)

Per Akinsanya, J., quoted with approval by Wali, JSC, in Biocon Agrochemicals (Nigeria) Ltd. v. Kudu Holding (PTY) Ltd. (2000) NLC-1101995(SC) at pp. 27–28; Paras. D–E, A.
"The test to be applied for the joinder of an intervener is whether he will be directly affected by the judgment of the court in the suit by curtailing or interfering with the enjoyment of his legal right — because the only reason which makes it necessary to make a person a party to an action is that he should be bound by the result of the action and the question to be settled therefore must be a question in the action which cannot be effectually and completely settled unless he is a party."
View Judgment

EXPLANATION / SCOPE

This refines joinder principles (Principles 261-262, 411, 486, 522). Test for intervener joinder: Will they be directly affected? Judgment must curtail or interfere with their legal rights—not mere interest but actual legal right affected. Why necessary? Person must be party because: they’ll be bound by result, their participation essential for effectual/complete settlement, and question cannot be properly settled without them. “Directly affected” means: their legal rights impacted, not merely factual or economic interest, and judgment operates on their rights. “Curtailing or interfering with legal right” means: reducing their rights, preventing rights exercise, or altering their legal position. This serves: ensuring all affected rights-holders participate, enabling complete dispute resolution, and preventing judgments affecting non-parties’ rights. However, not every interested person is necessary party—only those: whose legal rights (not mere interests) are affected, whose participation is essential for complete settlement, and who will be bound by result. Courts assess: does applicant have legal right affected by judgment? can case be completely settled without them? This prevents: excessive joinder of mere interested persons, while ensuring necessary parties with affected legal rights participate. The principle focuses on legal rights, not economic interests or curiosity.

CASES APPLYING THIS PRINCIPLE