LEGAL PRINCIPLE: CIVIL PROCEDURE – Pleadings – Binding Nature – Evidence at Variance with Pleadings
PRINCIPLE STATEMENT
A party is bound by their pleading, and evidence which is at variance with any averment in the pleading is contrary to that aspect of the case related thereto as structured in the pleading; the evidence, to use the now familiar phrase, is then said to go to no issue raised or joined on the pleadings; it must be rejected.
RATIO DECIDENDI (SOURCE)
"a party is bound by his pleading, and evidence which is at variance with any averment in the pleading is contrary to that aspect of the case related thereto as structured in the pleading. The evidence, to use the now familiar phrase, is then said to go to no issue raised or joined on the pleadings. It must be rejected."
EXPLANATION / SCOPE
This reinforces fundamental pleading principle. Parties are bound by pleadings—cannot depart from them through evidence. Evidence at variance with pleadings: contradicts averments, introduces unpleaded matters, or changes case as structured in pleadings. Such evidence: “goes to no issue raised or joined,” doesn’t address pleaded matters, and must be rejected. This serves: maintaining pleadings’ function (defining issues), giving opponent fair notice of case to meet, and preventing trial by ambush. “Bound by pleading” means: cannot prove facts inconsistent with pleaded case, evidence must support pleaded case, and cannot change theory at trial through evidence. “At variance” means: contradicts pleadings, materially different from averments, or introduces new case. “Goes to no issue” means: doesn’t address matters pleaded and joined, irrelevant to pleaded case, and outside defined issues. Remedy: Court must reject such evidence—cannot consider it, base findings on it, or allow it to change case. This prevents: parties from: pleading one case and proving another, surprising opponents with unpleaded theories, and circumventing notice function of pleadings. However: Evidence supporting pleadings in different way than expected may be admissible—variance must be material. Minor variations acceptable; fundamental contradictions are not. This principle enforces pleadings’ primacy in structuring cases and defining issues for trial.