PRINCIPLE STATEMENT

A litigant applying for a stay of execution must show special or exceptional circumstances, pleading eloquently the balance of justice weighing in his favour, though what constitutes special circumstances may vary from case to case.

RATIO DECIDENDI (SOURCE)

Per Kutigi, JSC, in Olunloyo v. Adeniran (2001) NLC-891999(SC) at p. 5; Paras C–D.
"A litigant applying for a stay of execution must thus show special or exceptional circumstances pleading eloquently the balance of justice weighing in his favour, even though what constitutes special or exceptional circumstance may vary from case to case."
View Judgment

EXPLANATION / SCOPE

The applicant for a stay of execution bears the burden of demonstrating special or exceptional circumstances. The applicant must show that the balance of justice weighs in his favour. The standard is high because the judgment is presumed correct. Special circumstances vary by case; no rigid formula applies. The court examines the specific facts. The applicant must “plead eloquently”—make a compelling case. Mere assertion of an appeal is insufficient. The applicant must demonstrate that execution would cause irreparable harm or render the appeal nugatory. The principle ensures that stays are not granted lightly. The opposing party’s right to enjoy the fruits of judgment is a strong counterweight. The applicant must provide evidence, not mere argument.

CASES APPLYING THIS PRINCIPLE