LEGAL PRINCIPLE: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Unchallenged Evidence — Minimal Proof Principle
PRINCIPLE STATEMENT
If there is nothing on the other side of the scale, why the minimal proof?
RATIO DECIDENDI (SOURCE)
Per Tobi, JSC, in Okoebor v. Police Council & Ors (2003) NLC-331999(SC) at p. 11; Paras A–B.
"If there is nothing on the other side of the scale, why the minimal proof?"
EXPLANATION / SCOPE
Where the defence does not challenge or contradict the plaintiff’s case, the plaintiff’s evidence may be accepted with minimal proof. The principle applies to civil proceedings. The court’s task is easier when evidence is unchallenged. The rule promotes efficiency. The plaintiff must still present credible evidence. The principle is well-established.