LEGAL PRINCIPLE: CHIEFTAINCY LAW — Declaratory Reliefs — Effect of Void Nomination on Subsequent Installation
PRINCIPLE STATEMENT
If a nomination or selection is void (not in accordance with custom), nothing can stand on it, including any subsequent installation.
RATIO DECIDENDI (SOURCE)
Per Edozie, JSC, in Ogolo & Ors v. Ogolo & Ors (2003) NLC-1931997(SC) at p. 16; Paras D–E.
"The plaintiffs having failed to show that the nomination or selection of the 1st plaintiff was in accordance with custom, the purported nomination was void and a nullity and as such nothing can stand on it."
EXPLANATION / SCOPE
A void nomination invalidates any subsequent installation. The principle applies to chieftaincy and customary law. The court cannot cure a void act. The rule ensures compliance with custom. The plaintiff must prove proper nomination. The principle is well-established.