PRINCIPLE STATEMENT

When evidence of traditional history is not contradicted or in conflict and found to be cogent, it can support a claim for declaration of title.

RATIO DECIDENDI (SOURCE)

Per Ejiwunmi, JSC, in Ogbogu & Ors v. Ugwuegbu & Anor (2003) NLC-1151998(SC) at p. 22; Paras A–C.
"When evidence of traditional history is not contradicted or in conflict and found to be cogent, it can support a claim for declaration of title."
View Judgment

EXPLANATION / SCOPE

Uncontradicted traditional evidence can ground title. The principle applies to land disputes. The evidence must be cogent. The rule recognises the validity of traditional evidence. The court may rely on it alone. The principle is well-established.

CASES APPLYING THIS PRINCIPLE