LEGAL PRINCIPLE: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — Interpretation of Statutes — Ejusdem Generis Rule — Application to Section 66(1)(h) of the 1999 Constitution
PRINCIPLE STATEMENT
The ejusdem generis rule provides that where particular words are followed by general words, the general words are limited to the same kind as the particular words, unless a wider sense was intended.
RATIO DECIDENDI (SOURCE)
Per Edozie, JSC, in Okotie-Eboh v. Manager & Ors (2004) NLC-1972003(SC) at pp. 21–22; Paras E–A.
"Another recognised canon of interpretation is the ejusdem generis rule which provides that where particular words are followed by general words, the general words are limited to the same kind as the particular words, unless, of course, there be something to show that a wider sense was intended: Allen v. Emmerson (1944) 1 K.B. 362, Buhari v. Yusuf (2003) 14 NWLR (Pt. 841) 446 at 536, Shell v. F.B.I.R. (1996) 8 NWLR (Pt. 466) 256; (1996) 970 SCNJ 231 at 262."
EXPLANATION / SCOPE
General words following specific words are confined to the same class. The principle applies to statutory interpretation. The rule prevents expansive reading of general words. The court will apply ejusdem generis where appropriate. The principle is well-established.
