PRINCIPLE STATEMENT

In an action for declaration of title to land, a plaintiff can only succeed on the strength of his own case and may not rely on the weakness of the opposing party's case. The burden is always on the plaintiff to prove his case on the preponderance of evidence or balance of probabilities.

RATIO DECIDENDI (SOURCE)

Per Musdapher, JSC, in Shittu & Ors v. Fashawe (2005) NLC-212001(SC) at pp. 11–12; Paras E–A.
"Now, there is no doubt that in action for declaration for title to land such as this case, a plaintiff can only ordinarily succeed on the strength of his case and may not rely on the weakness of the case of the opposing party to obtain judgment… The burden is always on the plaintiff to prove his case on the preponderance of evidence or balance of probabilities."
View Judgment

EXPLANATION / SCOPE

A plaintiff seeking declaration of title must succeed on his own evidence, not on the defendant’s weak defence. The burden remains on the plaintiff throughout. The principle applies to land law. The rule prevents judgment based on the defendant’s failure to prove its case. The plaintiff’s evidence must independently establish title. Weakness in the defence does not relieve the plaintiff of proof.

CASES APPLYING THIS PRINCIPLE