Ratio Decidendi

Per Oguntade, JSC, in Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Limited v. Tiebo & Ors (2005) NLC-91999(SC) at p. 18; Paras C–D:

"The only circumstance justifying an interference with the award of general damages made by a court of trial by an appellate court is when the award is manifestly too high or manifestly too little so as to raise inference that it was an erroneous assessment of the damage suffered or where the trial Judge had made the award relying on a wrong principle."

Explanation / Scope

General damages awards are within trial court’s discretion. Interference requires manifest excess or inadequacy, or reliance on wrong principle. The principle applies to appellate practice and damages.

Cases Applying This Principle