Principle Statement

Where traditional evidence is not contradicted or in conflict, it can support a claim for declaration of title.

Ratio Decidendi (Source)

Per Katsina-Alu, JSC, in Amayo v. Erinmwingbovo (2006) NLC-123-323-2001(SC) at p. 8; Paras A–B.

"Where traditional evidence is not contradicted or in conflict it can support a claim for declaration of title."

Explanation / Scope

Uncontradicted traditional history is sufficient for declaration of title. The principle applies to land law.

Cases Applying This Principle