Principle Statement

In considering a no case submission, the trial court must confine itself strictly to the evidence tendered in court and tested or capable of being tested in cross-examination. Statements in the proof of evidence are not a proper basis for the court's ruling.

Ratio Decidendi (Source)

Per Tabai, JSC, in Mohammed v. State (2007) NLC-123-147-2005(SC) at p. 7; Paras A–E.

"In considering whether or not there was a prima facie case against the Appellant, the Court below was bound to confine itself to the evidence, strictly so called, tendered in court."

Explanation / Scope

The proof of evidence is a pre-trial document used for preliminary purposes, not evidence in the trial. The court’s decision on a no case submission must be based solely on the oral and documentary evidence that was formally tendered and admitted. The court cannot rely on witness statements, police reports, or other pre-trial materials. This ensures that the accused is protected from conviction based on untested or inadmissible materials. The principle is fundamental to the fairness of criminal trials.

Cases Applying This Principle