APPELLATE PRACTICE — Concurrent Findings of Fact — Interference by Supreme Court — Conditions for Disturbing Concurrent Findings
Ratio Decidendi
Per I. F. Ogbuagu, JSC, in Ibuluya & Ors v. Dikibo & Ors (2010) NLC-1492001(SC) at p. 22; Paras C-D:
"The attitude of this Court not to disturb or interfere in those circumstances [concurrent findings of fact], is now firmly settled in a line of decided authorities."
Explanation / Scope
This principle establishes the Supreme Court’s settled attitude of not disturbing concurrent findings of fact. The principle applies where two lower courts have agreed on factual findings. It promotes finality and respect for trial courts. The principle reflects the limited scope of appellate review. It prevents unnecessary interference. The court must defer unless an exception applies. The principle provides guidance on appellate review of concurrent findings.