Ratio Decidendi

Per Chukwuma-Eneh, JSC, in Ojiogu v. Ojiogu (2010) NLC-123-235-2004(SC) at p. 6; Paras D–E:

"A reply brief is necessary when an issue of law or new questions are raised in the respondent's brief of argument otherwise it is not required."

Explanation / Scope

This principle establishes that a reply brief is only necessary where the respondent’s brief raises new issues of law or new questions. Otherwise, it is not required. The principle applies in appellate practice. It ensures that reply briefs are used appropriately. The principle reflects the purpose of reply briefs. It prevents unnecessary briefs. The court must determine if new issues are raised. The principle provides guidance on when a reply brief is necessary.

Cases Applying This Principle