Having regard to the complaint of the Appellant that PW1, PW2, PW3 and PW4, each gave hearsay evidence that it was the Appellant who gave the…

The prosecutorial responsibility is to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt in order to secure the conviction of the Appellant. How they get around achieving this…

The prosecution's duty lies in calling such witnesses as they would require to establish their case against an accused person. ... The question is, as always,…

It is of course common ground that there was no direct evidence that connected the Appellant with the commission of the despicable murder of the innocent…

Each case depends on its own facts but the one test which such evidence must satisfy is that it should lead to the guilt of the…

...the evidence though indirect, is cogent, positive and compelling, pointing to Appellant and to no other person for the commission of the offence. It can be…

For circumstantial evidence to sustain the conviction of an accused, it must be established that the evidence relied upon must be consistent with the prisoner's guilt…

The resolution of conflicting traditional evidence is certainly not limited to the resolution of conflicting claims with regard to ownership or title to land. As has…

Where there is a conflict of traditional history, one side or the other must be mistaken, yet both may be honest in their belief. In such…

Issues are meant to be formulated, not on each ground of appeal, but raised out of a combination of the essential complaints of the appellants in…

Where a court of trial had clearly evaluated the evidence and appraised the facts, it is not the business of a Court of Appeal to substitute…

An appellant who desires that this court should upset the concurrent findings of two lower courts has the burden of showing in a clear and positive…