Ratio Decidendi

Per Muhammad, JSC, in Efet v. INEC & Ors (2011) NLC-123-207-2009(SC) at p. 20; Paras A—B:

"To consider the merit of this appeal is like beating a dead horse. It serves no useful purpose. It is an exercise in futility. Courts of law dissipate energy on live issues. Courts of law for long, have left academic issues to the academia. They rather concentrate on live issues."

Explanation / Scope

This principle establishes that courts will decline jurisdiction over academic issues, as they serve no useful purpose and are an exercise in futility. Courts concentrate on live issues and leave academic matters to academia. The principle applies where issues are moot or academic. It ensures that judicial resources are not wasted. The principle reflects the requirement for live disputes. It prevents courts from deciding academic questions. The court must decline jurisdiction. The principle provides guidance on academic issues.

Cases Applying This Principle