APPELLATE PRACTICE ā Concurrent Findings of Fact ā Interference by Supreme Court
Principle Statement
This court will not interfere unless for compelling reasons clearly depicted. I cannot see my way clear in interfering with the concurrent finding of fact able arrived at by the two courts below.
Ratio Decidendi (Source)
Per Fabiyi, JSC, in Orlu v. Gogo-Abite (2010) NLC-123-234-2002(SC) at p. 10; Paras CāD.
"This court will not interfere unless for compelling reasons clearly depicted. I cannot see my way clear in interfering with the concurrent finding of fact able arrived at by the two courts below."
Explanation / Scope
This principle establishes that the Supreme Court will not interfere with concurrent findings of fact unless compelling reasons are clearly shown. The principle applies where both lower courts agree on factual findings. It promotes finality and respect for trial courts. The principle reflects the limited scope of appellate review. It prevents unnecessary interference. The appellant must demonstrate compelling reasons. The principle provides guidance on the standard for interference.
