APPELLATE PRACTICE — Concurrent Findings of Fact — When Supreme Court Will Interfere
Ratio Decidendi
Per Galadima, JSC, in Onwubuariri & Ors v. Igboasoyi & Ors (2011) NLC-123-212-2003(SC) at p. 22; Paras A—B:
"This Court does not make a practice of disturbing concurrent findings of facts except in very exceptional circumstances, such as where the findings are perverse or cannot be supported by the evidence on record or against procedural or substantive law."
Explanation / Scope
This principle establishes that the Supreme Court will not disturb concurrent findings of fact except in exceptional circumstances, such as perverse findings, unsupported findings, or findings against procedural or substantive law. The principle applies where concurrent findings are challenged. It ensures that findings are respected. The principle reflects the limited scope of appellate review. It prevents unnecessary interference. The court must find an exception. The principle provides guidance on when the Supreme Court will interfere.