LEGAL PRINCIPLE: APPELLATE PRACTICE — Concurrent Findings — Supreme Court Will Not Usurp Trial Court’s Function to Make Primary Findings of Fact

"In a matter of this nature, the Supreme Court cannot function outside its normal constitutional role as an appellate court which is to consider whether issues raised in the trial court have been competently decided there and thereafter properly examined on appeal by the Court of Appeal. Issues not raised, or if raised not decided by the trial court, will not normally be allowed to be raised on appeal... The Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to hear a suit or an issue in a suit fit for the High Court. Hence the general rule adopted by the Supreme Court is that an appellant will not be allowed to raise on appeal a question which was not raised or tried or considered by the trial court."