PRINCIPLE STATEMENT

Where the number of issues distilled far exceeds the number of grounds of appeal, it shows palpable ignorance of the law. It means the appellant does not know or is not sure what he is appealing against.

RATIO DECIDENDI (SOURCE)

Per Pats-Acholonu, JSC, in Mercantile Bank of Nig. Plc. & Anor v. Nwobodo (2005) NLC-382001(SC) at p. 2; Paras C–D.
"Where the number of issues distilled are far in excess of the number of grounds of appeal, then the implication is that there has been a parade or display of palpable ignorance, nay, culpable lack of the knowledge of the law. It means that the appellant does not even know or is not sure what he is appealing against."
View Judgment

EXPLANATION / SCOPE

Issues must correspond to grounds; excess issues indicate confusion. The principle applies to appellate practice. Proper issue formulation requires grounding in the grounds of appeal.

CASES APPLYING THIS PRINCIPLE