Principle

APPELLATE PRACTICE — Re-Evaluation of Evidence — Permissible After Expunging Inadmissible Evidence if Credible Evidence Remains

Area of law
APPELLATE PRACTICE
Court
Supreme Court

Appellate courts generally defer to trial judges on factual findings due to their advantage of observing witnesses. However, this deference ceases when findings are perverse—against the weight of evidence—or when inadmissible evidence is improperly relied upon. In such cases, the appellate court must expunge the…

Read the full principle with Sanctum

Sanctum is the key to all NLC content: judgments, principles, statutes, rules of court and court forms. Choose a plan from 1 month to 36 months.