PRINCIPLE STATEMENT

A consequential order could only be made directing a party who participated in the proceedings before the court and was involved in the judgment to do certain things; you cannot make a consequential order directing a complete stranger to the proceedings and judgment to pay money in satisfaction of the enforcement of a judgment; if such an order is to be made the party being directed to comply with it must be given notice of it so as to have the opportunity to oppose it.

RATIO DECIDENDI (SOURCE)

Per Uthman Mohammed, JSC, in Attorney-General of the Federation v. A. I. C. Limited (2000) NLC-1851994(SC) at p. 14; Paras. B–D.
"A consequential order could only be made directing a party who participated in the proceedings before the court and was involved in the judgment to do certain things. You cannot make a consequential order directing a complete stranger to the proceedings and judgment to pay money in satisfaction the enforcement of a judgment. If such an order is to be made the party being directed to comply with it must be given notice of it so as to have the opportunity to oppose it."
View Judgment

EXPLANATION / SCOPE

Consequential orders can only bind parties to proceedings. Who can be subject: Only those who: participated in proceedings, were involved in judgment, and had opportunity to be heard. Who cannot: Complete strangers to proceedings—those who: weren’t parties, didn’t participate, and weren’t involved in judgment. Notice requirement: If order affects someone, they must: receive notice, have opportunity to oppose, and be heard before order made. This serves: fair hearing (no orders without notice), due process (opportunity to oppose), and preventing binding strangers. “Participated…and involved” means: actual party status, participation in litigation, and subject to judgment. “Complete stranger” means: not party, no participation, and no connection to proceedings. Courts cannot: bind non-parties through consequential orders, order strangers to pay/do things, or enforce judgments against non-participants. Why: Judgments bind only parties—strangers have: no notice of proceedings, no opportunity to defend, and no involvement in determination. Extending orders to strangers violates: fair hearing, due process, and judgment’s limited scope. If non-party compliance sought: must join them as party, give notice and opportunity to be heard, and obtain judgment against them. Cannot use consequential orders to: circumvent party requirements, bind those unheard, or enforce against strangers. This principle protects non-parties from orders made without their participation or notice.

CASES APPLYING THIS PRINCIPLE