Ratio Decidendi

Per Musdapher, JSC, in Gbadamosi v. Dairo & Anor (2007) NLC-123-167-2001(SC) at pp. 8–9; Paras E–B:

"But where the area of land in dispute is well known to the parties, the question of proof of the identity of the land does not arise. In such a situation, it cannot be contended that the area claimed of the land in dispute is uncertain."

Explanation / Scope

Proof of the identity of land is a condition precedent to a grant of title. However, the law does not require proof of that which is common knowledge or admitted by the parties. Where the pleadings and evidence show that both parties are referring to the same physical land, and the defendant has not challenged its location or boundaries, the issue of identity is settled. The plaintiff need not call a surveyor or tender a plan in such cases. The principle promotes judicial economy and avoids unnecessary technicalities. It applies where the parties’ conduct, descriptions, or concessions establish a common understanding of the land in dispute.

Cases Applying This Principle