PRINCIPLE STATEMENT

Properly construed and in light of the recitals and habendum, when a parcel of land is conveyed to a person as Secretary or agent of the Administrators of an estate and not in their personal or private capacity, with or without a reconveyance, the administrators are competent to institute action both as administrators and beneficiaries of the estate; the conveyance does not divest them of their interest in the land in dispute.

RATIO DECIDENDI (SOURCE)

Per Ogwuegbu, JSC, in Evbuomwan v. Elema (1994) NLC-71992(SC) at p. 22; Paras. A—B.
"Properly construed and in the light of the recitals and the habendum reproduced above, it is quite clear that by Exhibit 'D' the parcel of land was conveyed to the 3rd respondent as the Secretary or agent of the Administrators of the estate and not in his personal or private capacity. It is also my view that with or without a reconveyance, the plaintiffs were competent to institute the action both as administrators and beneficiaries of the estate. Exhibit 'D' did not in any way divest them of their interest in the land in dispute."
View Judgment

EXPLANATION / SCOPE

When property is conveyed to an agent/representative rather than personally, the principals retain standing and interest. Courts examine: recitals (introductory statements showing parties’ intentions), habendum (clause defining estate granted), and capacity in which conveyance was made. If conveyance shows the grantee acted as: agent, secretary, representative, or in official capacity (not personally), then: beneficial interest remains with principals, standing to sue is retained, and no reconveyance is needed for principals to sue. “Divest” means stripping of rights—a conveyance to an agent doesn’t divest principals because the agent holds for them, not personally. This protects: estate administrators who must act through agents, beneficiaries whose interests continue despite agent conveyances, and proper administration of estates. Courts look beyond formal title-holder to beneficial ownership, ensuring technical conveyances to agents don’t defeat principals’ rights or standing. The principle emphasizes substance over form in determining locus standi.

CASES APPLYING THIS PRINCIPLE