PRINCIPLE STATEMENT

In law, to amend any legal process affords a party — whether a plaintiff or defendant and even the appellant or respondent on appeal — to correct an error in the legal document. Such correction can be made informally where the process is yet to be served. After service, however, correction on legal process may be effected, depending on the prevailing rules of court, either by consent of both parties or upon motion on notice. Amendment enables the slips, blunders, errors and inadvertence of counsel to be corrected, in the interest of justice, ensuring always that no injustice is occasioned to the other party. The weight of judicial authorities leans in favour of allowing a party to amend its legal processes whenever the need arises in order to ensure that the real matter in controversy between the parties, shorn of manifest errors, mistakes and slips, is adequately brought to focus and determined, with the proviso, however, that the right of the adversary party is neither unduly compromised nor undressed.

RATIO DECIDENDI (SOURCE)

Per Achike, JSC, in Kode v. Yussuf (2001) NLC-2391993(SC) at pp. 31–32; Paras D–A.
"In law, to amend any legal process affords a party — whether a plaintiff or defendant and even the appellant or respondent on appeal — to correct an error in the legal document. Such correction can be made informally where the process is yet to be served. After service, however, correction on legal process may be effected, depending on the prevailing rules of court, either by consent of both parties or upon motion on notice. Amendment enables the slips, blunders, errors and inadvertence of counsel to be corrected, in the interest of justice, ensuring always that no injustice is occasioned to the other party. The weight of judicial authorities leans in favour of allowing a party to amend its legal processes whenever the need arises in order to ensure that the real matter in controversy between the parties, shorn of manifest errors, mistakes and slips, is adequately brought to focus and determined, with the proviso, however, that the right of the adversary party is neither unduly compromised nor undressed."
View Judgment

EXPLANATION / SCOPE

Amendment allows correction of slips, blunders, errors, and counsel’s inadvertence in the interest of justice. The court favours allowing amendments to bring the real controversy into focus, provided the opponent’s rights are not unduly compromised. Amendments may be made informally before service; after service, by consent or motion on notice. The principle favours substance over form. However, amendment will be refused if it causes injustice that cannot be compensated by costs. The court balances the need for correction against potential prejudice. The liberal approach encourages determination of cases on their merits. The opponent may be compensated by costs. The amendment must be sought bona fide, not for tactical advantage. The court’s discretion is guided by justice.

CASES APPLYING THIS PRINCIPLE