PRINCIPLE STATEMENT

In a case where title to land in dispute was in question, the action does not die with the defendant; if the cause of action is one that survives the death of either party, appointment of a person or persons to carry on the proceeding in place of the deceased party is a necessary function of the court.

RATIO DECIDENDI (SOURCE)

Per Ogundare, JSC, in Mbadinuju & Ors v. Ezuka & Ors (1994) NLC-2321992(SC) at pp. 24–25; Paras D–B.
"In a case where title to the land in dispute was in question, the action does not die with the defendant... If the cause of action is one that survives the death of either party, appointment of a person or persons to carry on the proceeding in place of the deceased party is a necessary function of the court."
View Judgment

EXPLANATION / SCOPE

Causes of action involving property rights (particularly land title) survive parties’ deaths. The maxim “actio personalis moritur cum persona” (personal actions die with the person) doesn’t apply to property-based actions. When a party dies during land title litigation: the action continues, not abates; the estate succeeds to the party’s interest; and representatives must be appointed to continue. Courts must: order appointment of legal representatives (executors, administrators, heirs), join them as parties, and continue proceedings. This ensures: property disputes reach resolution despite death, estates can protect deceased’s interests, and litigation doesn’t restart. Surviving causes include: title declarations, boundary disputes, trespass to land, and property-based claims. The court appointment power is “necessary”—essential to continuation, not discretionary. Without appointment, proceedings stall but don’t abate. This principle protects property rights continuity and prevents death from defeating valid claims or defenses in property litigation.

CASES APPLYING THIS PRINCIPLE