CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ā Constitutional Interpretation ā Clear and Unambiguous Provisions ā Literal Meaning to Be Given
Principle Statement
The proper approach to the interpretation of clear words of statute is to follow them, in their simple, grammatical and ordinary meaning rather than look further because that is what prima facie gives them their most reliable meaning. This is generally also true of the construction of Constitutional provisions if they are clear and unambiguous even when it is necessary to give them a liberal or broad interpretation.
Ratio Decidendi (Source)
Per Onnoghen, JSC, in Dapianlong & Ors v. Dariye & Anor (2007) NLC-123-39-2007(SC) at pp. 42ā43; Paras EāB.
"The proper approach to the interpretation of clear words of statute is to follow them, in their simple, grammatical and ordinary meaning rather than look further because that is what prima facie gives them their most reliable meaning. This is generally also true of the construction of Constitutional provisions if they are clear and unambiguous even when it is necessary to give them a liberal or broad interpretation."
Explanation / Scope
Clear statutory and constitutional provisions must be given their plain, grammatical, and ordinary meaning. Courts should not look beyond the words used when they are unambiguous. This applies even when a liberal or broad interpretation is required. The literal meaning is the most reliable guide to the intention of the lawmaker.
