Ratio Decidendi

Per Mukhtar, JSC, in Ajagbe v. Idowu (2011) NLC-123-271-2003(SC) at p. 9; Paras D—E:

"The contract of hire-purchase, or even more accurately the contract of hire with an option to purchase is one under which the owner of a chattel lets it out on hire and undertakes to sell it to or that it shall become the property of the hirer conditionally on his making a certain number of payments. Until the making however of the last payment, no property in the chattel passes where the contract between the parties amounts to an absolute agreement to sell and buy, whether the instrument be called a hire purchase agreement or not, the property in the chattel passes upon delivery, provided that such was the intention of the parties. The difference between a contract of sale at a price payable by instalment and a contract of hire purchase is that in the former, the purchaser has no option of terminating the contract and returning the chattel, whereas in the latter there is none. In each case, the substance of the transaction or the agreement must be looked at and not the mere words."

Explanation / Scope

This principle establishes that a hire purchase agreement is a contract of hire with an option to purchase, where property passes only upon final payment. If the contract is an absolute agreement to sell and buy, property passes upon delivery regardless of the label. The substance of the transaction, not the words, determines its nature. The principle applies in distinguishing hire purchase from credit sale. It ensures that the true nature of the agreement is determined. The principle reflects the importance of substance over form. The court must examine the transaction as a whole. The principle provides guidance on hire purchase agreements.

Cases Applying This Principle