CRIMINAL LAW — Burden of Proof — Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt — Meaning and Standard
Ratio Decidendi
Per Rhodes-Vivour, JSC, in Joseph v. State (2011) NLC-123-48-2010(SC) at pp. 5; Paras B–C:
"Proof beyond reasonable doubt does not mean proof beyond all doubt, or all shadow of doubt. It means the prosecution establishing the guilt of the accused person with compelling and conclusive evidence. It means a degree of compulsion which is consistent with a high degree of probability."
Explanation / Scope
This principle establishes that proof beyond reasonable doubt does not require proof beyond all doubt or all shadow of doubt. It requires the prosecution to establish guilt with compelling and conclusive evidence, consistent with a high degree of probability. The principle applies in all criminal trials. It ensures that the standard is properly understood. The principle reflects that the standard is high but not absolute. It prevents acquittals based on fanciful possibilities. The court must apply this standard in assessing evidence. The principle provides guidance on the meaning of proof beyond reasonable doubt.