CRIMINAL LAW ā Burden of Proof ā Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt ā Quality Not Quantity of Witnesses
Principle Statement
Proof beyond reasonable doubt, is not attained by the number of witnesses fielded by the prosecution. It depends on the quality of the evidence tendered by the prosecution.
Ratio Decidendi (Source)
Per OGBUAGU, J.S.C., in Nkebisi & Anor v. State (2010) NLC-123-395-2002(SC) at p. 11; Paras CāD.
"Proof beyond reasonable doubt, is not attained by the number of witnesses fielded by the prosecution. It depends on the quality of the evidence tendered by the prosecution."
Explanation / Scope
This principle establishes that proof beyond reasonable doubt depends on the quality, not quantity, of evidence. The number of witnesses is not determinative. The principle applies in criminal trials. It ensures that the focus is on the quality of evidence. The principle reflects that one credible witness can suffice. It prevents reliance on the number of witnesses. The court must assess the quality of evidence. The principle provides guidance on the standard of proof.
