PRINCIPLE STATEMENT

In a criminal trial, it is unsafe to base a conviction on speculative findings based not on what the appellant did but on what he ought to have done.

RATIO DECIDENDI (SOURCE)

Per Kutigi, JSC, in Idowu v. State (1998) NLC-1751997(SC) at p. 5; Paras A–B.
"In a criminal trial, it is unsafe to base a conviction on speculative findings based not on what the appellant did but on what he ought to have done."
View Judgment

EXPLANATION / SCOPE

Convictions must be based on evidence of what the accused did, not speculation. The principle applies to all criminal trials. The court cannot infer guilt from what the accused should have done. The rule protects against wrongful conviction. The prosecution must prove actual conduct. The principle is fundamental.

CASES APPLYING THIS PRINCIPLE

None recorded.