PRINCIPLE STATEMENT

Non-payment of tribute or rent may not necessarily constitute misconduct or misbehaviour to result in forfeiture, but combined with other acts, such non-payment becomes a clear ground for forfeiture of the customary tenancy.

RATIO DECIDENDI (SOURCE)

Per Tobi, JSC, in Okpala & Ors v. Okpu & Ors (2003) NLC-1211997(SC) at p. 14; Paras D–E.
"Although non-payment of tribute or rent may not necessarily constitute misconduct or misbehaviour to result in forfeiture, the totality of the above acts of the appellants make such non-payment a clear ground for forfeiture of the customary tenancy."
View Judgment

EXPLANATION / SCOPE

Non-payment alone may not justify forfeiture, but with other acts, it becomes a ground. The principle applies to customary tenancy. The court considers the totality of conduct. The rule protects the overlord’s rights. The tenant’s cumulative misconduct may lead to forfeiture. The principle is well-established.

CASES APPLYING THIS PRINCIPLE