PRINCIPLE STATEMENT

Complaints against breaches of the Constitution and Companies and Allied Matters Act (or any other law) are not cognisable in an election petition based, founded, or rooted in section 239(1)(a) of the Constitution.

RATIO DECIDENDI (SOURCE)

Per Kutigi, JSC, in Obasanjo & Ors v. Yusuf & Anor (2004) NLC-1932003(SC) at pp. 18–19; Paras E–A.
"Complaints against breaches of the Constitution and Companies and Allied Matters Act (or any other law) are not cognizable in an election petition based, founded or rooted in section 239(1)(a) of the Constitution."
View Judgment

EXPLANATION / SCOPE

Election petitions cannot challenge non-electoral laws. The principle applies to election law. Only election-related complaints are cognisable. The rule limits the scope of election petitions. The petitioner must file separate proceedings for other grievances. The principle is well-established.

CASES APPLYING THIS PRINCIPLE