ELECTION LAW — Statutory Interpretation — Clear and Unambiguous Words — Ordinary Meaning Rule
Ratio Decidendi
Per Onnoghen, JSC, in Shettima & Ors v. Goni & Ors (Consolidated) (2011) NLC-123-332-2011(SC) at p. 12; Paras A—B:
"It is my considered view that the three provisions quoted supra are clear and unambiguous and by the principles of interpretation of statute, to the effect that where the words of any statute are clear and unambiguous, they must be given their ordinary meaning unless this would lead to absurdity or be in conflict with other provisions of the constitution or statute, effect must be given to those provisions without recourse to any other consideration, they ought to be so treated."
Explanation / Scope
This principle establishes that where statutory words are clear and unambiguous, they must be given their ordinary meaning unless this leads to absurdity or conflict with other provisions. The principle applies in statutory interpretation. It ensures that clear words are given effect. The principle reflects the literal rule of interpretation. It prevents courts from reading meanings into clear provisions. The court must give effect to the ordinary meaning. The principle provides guidance on statutory interpretation.