LEGAL PRINCIPLE: EVIDENCE LAW – Burden of Proof – Onus of Proving Minister’s Permission Lies on Person Charged
PRINCIPLE STATEMENT
The onus of proving that any payment was made or anything done was with the permission of the appropriate authority shall be on the person charged.
RATIO DECIDENDI (SOURCE)
Per Igu, JSC, in Alao v. African Continental Bank Ltd. (1998) NLC-141995(SC) at p. 42; Para E.
"The onus of proving that any payment was made or anything done was with the permission of the appropriate authority shall be on the person charged."
EXPLANATION / SCOPE
Under the Exchange Control Act, the person charged bears the burden of proving that the transaction had the required permission. The principle shifts the burden to the defendant. The rule applies to criminal and civil proceedings under the Act. The accused must prove permission on the balance of probabilities. The principle is statutory. The prosecution need not prove absence of permission. The rule promotes enforcement of exchange control regulations. The defendant must adduce evidence of permission. The court will presume the absence of permission unless proved otherwise.