EVIDENCE LAW — Corroboration — When Required — Armed Robbery Not Within Class Requiring Corroboration by Statute
Ratio Decidendi
Per O.O. Adekeye, JSC, in Afolalu v. State (2010) NLC-123-193-2008(SC) at p. 15, para. E:
"The case of robbery does not fall within the class of offences where corroboration is required by statute. The trial court had rightly believed the evidence against the appellant before him in proof of the offence of robbery."
Explanation / Scope
This principle establishes that armed robbery does not require corroboration by statute; the court can convict on the credible evidence of a single witness. The principle applies in armed robbery trials. It ensures that corroboration is not required where not mandated. The principle reflects that the court can rely on credible evidence. It prevents acquittals where evidence is sufficient. The court must assess the credibility of the evidence. The principle provides guidance on corroboration requirements.