PRINCIPLE STATEMENT

A survey plan is not necessary in all cases of declaration of title; where there is no difficulty in identifying the land in dispute, a declaration may be made without a survey plan.

RATIO DECIDENDI (SOURCE)

Per Iguh, JSC, in Agbeje & Ors v. Ajibola & Ors (2002) NLC-341996(SC) at p. 13; Paras D–E.
"The filing of a survey plan is not however necessary in all cases of declaration of title to land. Where there is no difficulty in identifying the land in dispute, a declaration of title may be made without it being based on a survey plan."
View Judgment

EXPLANATION / SCOPE

A survey plan is not mandatory in every land case. If the land is well known to both parties and there is no difficulty in identification, a declaration may be made without a plan. The principle applies where the land’s boundaries are clear and undisputed. The court can rely on oral descriptions and other evidence. The requirement for a survey plan is not absolute. The key is whether the land can be sufficiently identified. The rule prevents technical dismissal where identity is clear. The plaintiff must still prove identity by other means. The court may visit the locus to resolve doubts. The principle promotes substance over form.

CASES APPLYING THIS PRINCIPLE