PRINCIPLE STATEMENT

If a plaintiff claiming a declaration of title to land claimed a larger parcel but succeeds in proving the boundaries and title to a small parcel of land, they are entitled to a declaration of title in respect of the smaller part of the land originally in dispute, the title and boundaries of which they have proved with certainty.

RATIO DECIDENDI (SOURCE)

Per Adio, JSC, in Okedare v. Adebara & 2 Ors (1994) NLC-291991(SC) at p. 11; Paras. B–C.
"if a plaintiff who is claiming a declaration of title to land claimed a larger parcel of land but succeeds in proving the boundaries and title to a small parcel of land, he is entitled to a declaration of title in respect of the smaller part of the land originally in dispute, the title and boundaries of which he has proved with certainty."
View Judgment

EXPLANATION / SCOPE

Courts grant declarations for portions of land actually proved even if plaintiff claimed more. If plaintiff claims: 10 acres but proves title and boundaries to only 5 acres, declaration is granted for the 5 acres proved. This prevents: all-or-nothing outcomes, defeating valid claims because plaintiff overreached, and requiring exact correspondence between claim and proof. Requirements for partial declaration: (1) the proved portion is part of the originally claimed land; (2) boundaries of proved portion are certain; (3) title to proved portion is established. Courts cannot grant: more than claimed (plaintiff’s claim limits relief), or declarations for land with uncertain boundaries (even if partly within claim). This serves: doing justice on proved facts, preventing overreaching from defeating meritorious partial claims, and ensuring claimants get what they prove. However, plaintiffs should: accurately survey and claim actual land owned, not inflate claims hoping to get more, as proof requirements remain strict. The principle allows partial success where partial proof exists, preventing technical defeats of partially meritorious claims.

CASES APPLYING THIS PRINCIPLE