Ratio Decidendi

Per Chukwuma-Eneh, JSC, in NSIT & Anor v. Klifco Nigeria Limited (2010) NLC-123-288-2005(SC) at p. 13; Paras A–C:

"It is not required as espoused in many cases that the precise amount i.e. figures of the debt must be stated… the amount here is ascertainable without any difficulty and without further evidence. In Ajike v. Cardoso and Anor (supra) this point has been highlighted and… it has held that it is not necessary to set out the precise amount of the debt."

Explanation / Scope

This principle establishes that an acknowledgment of debt need not state the precise amount; it is sufficient if the amount is ascertainable without difficulty. The principle applies where acknowledgment is relied upon to revive a statute-barred debt. It ensures that technical precision is not required. The principle reflects that substance prevails over form. It prevents debtors from escaping liability on technical grounds. The court must determine if the amount is ascertainable. The principle provides guidance on the requirements for acknowledgment of debt.

Cases Applying This Principle