LEGAL PRINCIPLE: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Logic in Judicial Decision-Making – Requirement That Judicial Decisions Flow Logically from Facts and Law
PRINCIPLE STATEMENT
Every court decision should not only flow logically from the conclusions of facts and law made by the court but should be readily seen to be a logical result of such conclusions.
RATIO DECIDENDI (SOURCE)
"Needless to state that every decision of a court of justice should not only flow logically from the conclusions of facts and of law made by the court but also be readily seen to be a logical result of such an exercise."
EXPLANATION / SCOPE
This principle addresses the fundamental requirement of logical coherence in judicial reasoning. Court decisions must exhibit two forms of logic: internal consistency (the disposition must follow from the findings) and transparent rationality (the logical connection must be apparent to readers). A judgment that makes certain factual and legal findings but reaches a conclusion inconsistent with those findings exhibits a logical defect warranting appellate correction. The principle ensures accountability in judicial reasoning, as appellate courts and parties can assess whether conclusions truly follow from premises. It promotes confidence in the judicial system by requiring that justice not only be done but be seen to be done through rational processes. Decisions lacking logical coherence, even if reaching correct results, may be set aside for failure to demonstrate proper reasoning.