PRINCIPLE STATEMENT

The proper course is first to examine the language of the statute and ask what is the natural meaning, uninfluenced by previous state of the law, not starting with how the law previously stood and then seeing if the words can bear an interpretation in conformity with that view.

RATIO DECIDENDI (SOURCE)

Per Uwaifo, JSC, in Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Okem Enterprises Limited (2004) NLC-922003(SC) at pp. 36–37; Paras E–A (quoting Lord Herschell in The Bank of England v. Vagliano Brothers (1891) AC 107 at 144–145).
"I think the proper course in the first instance is to examine the language of the statute and to ask what is the natural meaning, uninfluenced by any considerations derived from the previous state of the law, and not to start with inquiring how the law previously stood, and then, assuming that was probably intended to leave it unaltered, to see if the words of the enactment will bear an interpretation in conformity with this view."
View Judgment

EXPLANATION / SCOPE

Statutory interpretation must start with the plain natural meaning. The principle applies to statutory interpretation. Prior law should not influence the plain meaning. The rule prevents distortion of legislative intent. The court will give effect to clear words. The principle is well-established.

CASES APPLYING THIS PRINCIPLE

None recorded.