Principle Statement

A plaintiff who institutes an action for libel has put his character in issue. If evidence portrays him as an inveterate liar incapable of distinguishing truth from falsehood, he may have destroyed his character. He cannot complain if the court finds him a chronic liar.

Ratio Decidendi (Source)

Per Pats-Acholonu, JSC, in Iloabachie v. Iloabachie (2005) NLC-123-137-2000(SC) at pp. 6–7; Paras E–C.

"The tort of defamation, whether libel or slander, relates essentially to damages to the character of the person. In other words a plaintiff who institutes an action for libel has invariably put his character in issue. … Where in the process of the proceedings, facts elicited in the evidence portray him as an inveterate liar incapable of distinguishing truth from falsehood he might have unwittingly succeeded by his inconsistent statements and falsehoods destroyed his character which he has held out to the world to be clean. In such a case he cannot complain if the court finds out that he is a chronic, or penitus insitus liar."

Explanation / Scope

A defamation plaintiff puts his character at issue. False and inconsistent testimony may destroy his own character claim. The principle applies to tort law and defamation.

Cases Applying This Principle

None recorded.